Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tamiami Inv. Co. v. Berk

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 13, 1932No. 4531Published

1DissentThomson, District Judge

As I find myself unable to concur in the views of the majority of the court, and feeling that a fundamental principle is involved of very considerable importance, I hatfe thought it not inappropriate to briefly express my views by way of dissent.-

A corporate citizen of Florida conveyed to an Ohio corporation a tract of land in Florida. In part consideration of the purchase price, the purchaser executed and delivered to the vendor 31 promissory notes, and, as security for their payment, executed a mortgage on the property to the vendor. After-wards, the purchaser conveyed the land in question…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tuscany v. PappOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API