Legal Opinion

Tuscany v. Papp

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1928No. 8974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, PJ.

It is a well established doctrine that where a grantee assumed the obligation for the payment of a mortgage, he becomes personally liable to the mortgagee and the latter is then in a position where he may elect to treat the grantee as principal on the evidences of indebtedness and the makers as surety or he may reverse the order by his own election. We think this rule of law finds authority in Denison University v. Manning 65 OS. 138; Society of Friends v. Haynes 47 OS. 423 and Stearns on Suretyship, p. 25, Section 23 and Section 90.

_ In the case at bar we have the loan…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pikey v. Riles.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Tamiami Inv. Co. v. BerkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API