Mutual Trust Life Insurance v. Ecklund Building Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This controversy is wholly between the defendant Ecklund Building Company and the intervener, White-Price Company. John A. Ecklund had full charge of the Ecklund Building Company and managed and transacted all its business affairs. He seems to have considered himself as constituting the corporation and in transacting its business sometimes used his individual name. For the purposes of this case he and the Ecklund Building Company may be considered as identical and will be designated by the term defendant hereinafter.
In 1926 the defendant desired to erect an apartment building in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bottineau v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Wilson v. EigenbrodtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Hall v. McCormickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Solberg v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Carpenter v. Artisans' Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Van Diest Supply Co. v. Adrian State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981