United Brands Co. v. Intermediate Credit Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WERKER, District Judge.
This action arises out of an agreement which renegotiated the terms of a defaulted debt instrument. Plaintiff United Brands Company (“United”), as a creditor of defendant Metals Holding Corporation (“Metals”), has made a motion under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment against co-defendant Intermediate Credit Corporation (“Intermediate”), which it seeks to hold liable as Metals’ guarantor. United has not joined Metals in this motion.
Intermediate opposes the motion on numerous grounds. First, without adequate explanation, it relies…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Theda v. GiesowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Grenader v. SpitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- United Brands Co. v. Intermediate Credit Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977