Legal Opinion

United Brands Co. v. Intermediate Credit Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 10, 1977No. 75 Civ. 6034 (HFW)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WERKER, District Judge.

This action arises out of an agreement which renegotiated the terms of a defaulted debt instrument. Plaintiff United Brands Company (“United”), as a creditor of defendant Metals Holding Corporation (“Metals”), has made a motion under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment against co-defendant Intermediate Credit Corporation (“Intermediate”), which it seeks to hold liable as Metals’ guarantor. United has not joined Metals in this motion.

Intermediate opposes the motion on numerous grounds. First, without adequate explanation, it relies…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Theda v. GiesowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. Grenader v. SpitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Brands Co. v. Intermediate Credit Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API