Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Bagley & Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

Bagley & Company, the appellee, is engaged in the cotton business in Memphis, Tennessee. L. A. Waddell was employed by appellee as a cotton buyer for its Memphis 'branch. On the 30th day of September, 1926, Waddell, representing Bagley & Company in Arkansas, purchased 132 bales of cotton from different parties in Cotton Plant, Arkansas, and, late the same afternoon, called the central office of the appellant at Brinkley, and told the operator that he wanted to talk to A. T. LeFils at Memphis. After making repeated inquiries, Waddell was informed by the operator that he was connected with Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fortenbury v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Harris v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. JL McEntire & Sons, Inc. v. Hart Cotton Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Capps v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API