Legal Opinion

Ulvig v. McKennan Hospital

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1930No. File No. 6482PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff instituted his action below by the service of a relief summons, accompanied by a complaint as follows :

“Complaint.
“Plaintiff complains of the defendant and alleges:
“First.. “i. That at all times hereinafter mentioned the defendant was and still is a duly constituted and existing ¡body corporate, organized for the purpose of and conducting a general hospital in the city of Sioux Falls, in Minnehaha County, South Dakota, and to-contract to there receive, nurse, care for and protect persons requiring treatment by physicians and surgeons for physical ailments.
“2. That on or about March…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Davis v. RailwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  4. Needham v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1865
  5. Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Simons v. KiddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Steckman v. Silver Moon, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API