Legal Opinion

Carter v. Muller

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-6348PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

KATZ, Senior District Judge.

Petitioner Noah Carter has applied for parole several times since he became eligible to do so in 1995, and each time his parole has been denied. He alleges that these denials violate various of his constitutional rights, and on that basis seeks a writ of habeas corpus. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation recommends that Mr. Carter’s petition be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. I agree with the Report and Recommendation’s reasoning and conclusion, but I write further to elaborate on my assessment of the current state of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Wayne Paul Burkett v. William Love, Superintendent, Answering Blair County District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Myers v. RidgeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Rauso v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API