Legal Opinion
State v. Varnado
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 1998No. C7-97-960PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
582 N.W.2d 886 (1998)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Beverly Ann VARNADO, petitioner, Appellant.
No. C7-97-960.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 6, 1998.
Kevin A. Lund, Rochester, for Appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, State of Minnesota, Raymond F. Schmitz, Olmsted County Attorney by David S. Voigt, Assistant County Attorney, Rochester, for Respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
We must determine whether one of the well-established exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's search warrant requirement applies to the frisk that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. BerriosTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Kelsey C.R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BurbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.