Legal Opinion

Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 24, 2014No. A12-2301PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

The appellant, Lincoln Lamar Caldwell, challenged his conviction of first-degree *768premeditated murder for the benefit of a gang in his third petition for postconviction relief, in which he alleged that three witnesses presented false testimony at his trial. The postconviction court summarily denied the petition. On appeal, Caldwell argues that the court abused its discretion when it failed to grant him an evidentiary hearing in connection with his petition. Because we conclude that Caldwell has alleged facts that, if proven, would entitle him to relief, we reverse and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  3. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Brian Keith Hooper v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Edbert Neal Williams v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API