Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Arturo Solis Peralta

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided June 26, 2002No. 04-01-00818-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus in which appellant, Arturo Solis Peral-ta, alleges that the State is collaterally estopped from prosecuting the misdemean- or charge of assault filed against him. Specifically, Peralta asserts that the finding by a hearing officer at a parole revocation hearing that he did not violate a condition of his parole prevents the State’s prosecution of assault in the county court at law. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Peralta’s application.

BACKGROUND

Peralta was charged by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. C.J.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Applin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. State v. AkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Applin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  5. Conard Hargest, III v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API