Legal Opinion
Krichmar v. Krichmar
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 9, 1977PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the negative. There was no reservation of rights in the unlimited general release given on May 16, 1968 to the other joint tort-feasors, and, hence, the infant respondent’s parents, against whom this new action has been brought, were discharged from any alleged tort liability on their part (Oliver v Washburn, 46 AD2d 977, affd 39 NY2d 989; Berlow v New York State Thruway Auth., 29 NY2d 949; Milks v Mclver, 264 NY 267). The record does not suggest the existence of mutual *860mistak…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Milks v. McIverNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Lucio v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kimso Apartments, LLC v. Mahesh GandhiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Coral Gables Imported Motorcars, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Derago v. KoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Koufakis v. SiglagAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.