Legal Opinion

Foster v. Vehmeyer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1901No. Sac. No. 764PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This appeal is taken from an order setting aside a default judgment. The question presented is, Was the default prematurely taken? Defendant was served with summons by publication. The order for publication provided: “It is ordered that service of the summons in this action be made upon the defendant ... in the Pacific Bee, a newspaper published in said county of Sacramento; that such publication be made at least once a week for two months.” The first publication was made June 14th, and the last publication August 9th. The default was taken September 11th.

The default in this case could not be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Savings and Loan Society v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pinon v. PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Arnold v. Newhall County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Glass v. BenkertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Whealton v. WhealtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API