Legal Opinion

(PC) Martinez v. Campbell

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 7, 2024No. 1:22-cv-01549Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, No. 1:22-cv-01549-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE 15 Defendants. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF 16 (ECF No. 23) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API