Legal Opinion
Nowell v. Central Service Ass'n
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided July 6, 2000No. 4:99CV180LNPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
By memorandum opinion and order dated May 2, 2000, this court granted plaintiff Brenda Cumberland Nowell’s motion to remand. Defendant Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual), joined by Central Service Association (CSA), has moved the court to reconsider that ruling, and specifically, to reconsider the court’s determination that the Central Service Association Employee Retirement Plan is a governmental plan and therefore exempt from the coverage of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mead Corp. v. TilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Donovan v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Mdphysicians & Associates, Inc. v. State Board of Insurance, a Body Politic of the State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Hall v. Maine Municipal Employees Health TrustDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2000
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Artra Group, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Navlet v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Navlet v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Boos v. AT&T, INC.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Sara Lee Corp. v. American Bakers Ass'n Retirement PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Sara Lee Corporation v. American Bakers Association Retirement PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009