Legal Opinion

Gwinn v. Kane

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1975No. 5 Tr. Dkt. 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

Cross-motions for summary judgment posture the legal issues raised in this action in quo warranto by which plaintiff, Richard H. Gwinn, seeks to void an indictment charging him with perjury and false swearing. To accomplish this objective, plaintiff, by this action, attacks the office held by Walter M. Phillips, Jr., the role two of his subordinates played in the investigation and presentment leading to plaintiff’s indictment and the role they expect to play in the trial of plaintiff under the criminal justice system of our Commonwealth.

As history readily…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schermer v. FranekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Mayer v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. In re January 1974 Philadelphia County Grand Jury InvestigationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gwinn v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. BroccoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Zontek v. BrownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Hallman v. PhillipsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In Re: Special Prosecutor, Thirty-Fifth Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API