Legal Opinion

Mlincek v. United States (In re Mlincek)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 26, 2006No. Bankruptcy No. 05-27639; Adversary No. 06-1107PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

ARTHUR I. HARRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss (Docket # 7). The defendant urges dismissal of this adversary proceeding because the plaintiffs complaint does not present a justiciable ease or controversy. Because the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction for prudential reasons, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.

JURISDICTION

In the present case, the debtors have brought this adversary proceeding under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1), which excepts from discharge any debt—

for a tax or a customs duty-

(A) of the kind and for the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anthony J. Wallace - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2023
  2. Cabardo v. PatacsilUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Internal Revenue Service v. WallaceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2023
  4. Roberts v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API