Mlincek v. United States (In re Mlincek)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
ARTHUR I. HARRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss (Docket # 7). The defendant urges dismissal of this adversary proceeding because the plaintiffs complaint does not present a justiciable ease or controversy. Because the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction for prudential reasons, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.
JURISDICTION
In the present case, the debtors have brought this adversary proceeding under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1), which excepts from discharge any debt—
for a tax or a customs duty-
(A) of the kind and for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anthony J. Wallace - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2023
- Cabardo v. PatacsilUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Internal Revenue Service v. WallaceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2023
- Roberts v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021