Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Cecil

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FJBOM MAURY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Maury County. A. J. AbekNAthy, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAltsteb, J.

The object of this bill is to-recover damages for the alleged breach of a warranty in the sale of wheat. The bill alleges, that about August 25, 1897, complainant and defendant entered into a contract whereby it was agreed that defendant would sell and deliver at once, free on board cars at Ashwood, Tenn., 6,000 bushels of No. 2 wheat, and upon delivery thereof complainant should pay defendant the sum of one dollar per bushel for such wheat, the defendant, warranting that said wheat should be No. 2 wheat. Soon after the contract was made defendant notified complainant that he had delivered…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hearst v. ProffitTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Williams v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
  3. Norris v. Monarch Fire Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API