Legal Opinion

Hill v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 1985No. 84-AB-718; CA A31875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board which reversed a referee and found that he was disqualified from benefits because he had been discharged for misconduct connected with his work. Petitioner also objects to EAB’s finding that he willfully made a false statement to obtain benefits and that he must repay benefits previously received. We reverse.

Petitioner was a driver on a pickup and delivery route for a theatre supply company. During the course of his five months of employment, his supervisor received three complaints from theatre managers alleging a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petro v. EMP. DIV., DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Lewis v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Bremer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Ashmore v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitney v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Doke v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Kroetch v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API