Legal Opinion

Eloisa Gomes and Armando Gomes v. Mario Rosario

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 27, 2013No. 2012-2-AppealPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG,

for the Court.

This appeal arises out of a seven-day jury trial resulting from an automobile collision that occurred more than ten years ago. The jury found that the plaintiff, Eloísa Gomes (plaintiff or Gomes), failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant, Mario Rosario (defendant or Rosario), was negligent. 1 The trial justice, however, granted the plaintiffs motion for a new trial, finding that the jury’s assignment of “no liability to the defendant demonstrates that this court’s instructions were not clear or properly understood or applied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bourdon's, Inc. v. Ecin Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  2. McGarry v. PielechSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. Botelho v. Caster's Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of New England, Inc. v. GelatiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Pollard v. HastingsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jody King v. Huntress, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  2. Charles Kemp v. PJC of Rhode Island, Inc., d/b/a Rite Aid of Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
  3. Deborah Bates-Bridgmon v. Heong's Market, Inc. d/b/a Roch's MarketSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
  4. Pawtucket Redevelopment Agency v. Patricia BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  5. Willie Battle v. State of Rhode Island.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API