Legal Opinion
Fields v. Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 31, 1998No. CIV.A. 95-4026-GTV, CIV.A. 95-4027-GTVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
The case is before the court on plaintiffs motion to reconsider (Doc. 240) the court’s November 25,1997 Memorandum and Order. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff erroneously brings this motion pursuant to District of Kansas Rule 7.3. D. Kan. Rule 7.3, which has standards identical to those of Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 59(e), was enacted to handle exclusively non-dispositive judgments and orders. Steele v. Ellis, 961 F.Supp. 1458, 1467 (D.Kan.1997). Because the motion was filed within ten days of judgment, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Steele v. EllisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Barrett v. FieldsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. Bob Smith Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
- Iowa Beta Chapter of Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. State, University of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- HILL v. McKINLEYCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Tinius v. Carroll County Sheriff DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- Peavy v. HarmanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.