Legal Opinion

Ostrander v. Messmer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 15, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff had a verdict for $10,000, which the trial court set aside, specifying as the reason therefor that "the verdict is so excessive, that the jury must have entirely misapplied the evidence or been influenced by bias and prejudice." This is the second appeal in the cause. Upon the first trial the plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for $7,500, which was reversed by the St. Louis Court of Appeals and the cause remanded. [223 S.W. 438.] The suit is one for damages for alleged breach, by defendants, of a contract to issue and deliver to plaintiff ten shares of stock in the Continental…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haven v. Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Koons v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Morrell v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Chandler v. GloydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. McCloskey v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King Smith v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Sofian Ex Rel. Sofian v. DouglasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  3. Barnes Ex Rel. Barnes v. Real Silk Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Osborn v. Chandeysson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Foley v. Union House Furnishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API