Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 7, 2006No. 3D05-390Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUAREZ, Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder with a deadly weapon. We affirm.

The defendant seeks a new trial claiming that the State improperly impeached him at trial. He additionally seeks certification of the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as a matter of great public importance: FOLLOWING THE LaGRAND CASE, THE AVENA CASE AND PRESIDENT BUSH’S MEMORANDUM, HOW WILL FLORIDA REMEDY VIOLATIONS OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS? The State asserts that no evidentiary error occurred, and that the question should not be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Conde v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Pearce v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Marmol v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API