Marmol v. State

Camilo Marmol (defendant), appeals from a final judgment of conviction and sentence for the crimes of attempted second degree murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.

In his first claim, defendant argues that the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to ask the victim whether he had been threatened in any way and whether anyone had offered him “any money or other financial consideration to testify falsely ... in court,” when there was no factual basis for the question. The victim *765responded to the prosecutor’s question by-saying that he had never been…