Legal Opinion
State v. Curtis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 23, 1949PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Appellants contend, and rightly so, that Sections 3 and 16 of the Public Health Ordinance in question exceeds any lawful authority vested in the District Board of Health of Burke, Caldwell and McDowell Counties, and are void.
The statute, Gr.S. 130-66, as rewritten in Chapter 1030 of 1945 Session Laws of North Carolina and designated Gr.S. 130-66, subsections 1,'2, 3, 4 and 5, provides that the State Board of Health of North Carolina is authorized to, and, under the rules and regulations established by it, may form, when certain conditions exist, district health departments or units including…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Durham Provision Co. v. DavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Atlantic Express Co. v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Schloss v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Commonwealth v. DiazMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Harvell v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.