Legal Opinion

Dibble v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1944No. 160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Associate Judge.

Appeal from a conviction of violating blackout regulations promulgated by the District Commissioners pursuant to certain Acts of Congress.1 The charge was that defendant, as resident manager in charge of Suburban Gardens, a 10-acre housing development, had failed to extinguish a"street type” light within the development while a practice blackout was in progress. The contentions on this appeal fall into two groups, the first dealing with rulings on evidence, and the second with the sufficiency of the evidence.

I. The Evidential Questions

1. Proof of Defendanfs Agency.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tipp v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Mapes v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Simons v. Vulcan Oil & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  4. Blake v. BremyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hooper v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  2. Banks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Banks Ex Rel. Lacey v. B. F. Saul Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Cunningham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API