Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Boulder County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtElbert, J.

The bill in this case alleges that on the 25th day of July, 1875, the appellant, who was the complainant below, purchased of Davis a one-fourth interest in the Keystone mine ; that at the date of the purchase the mine was owned in common by the said Davis and one Clark; that Davis did not convey the said one-fourth interest to the appellant, but by agreement held the same in trust for him; that on the 25th day of August, 1875, appellant sold said fourth interest to the defendant, Henry C. Thompson, for the sum of one thousand dollars, payable five hundred dollars within twenty days, and five…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnett v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Jackson ex dem. Shipley v. MoncriefNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Latham v. HickySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reiger v. TurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Weghorst v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Pope v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Laramie Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Redfeather Lakes Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  5. Cone v. JacksonColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API