Legal Opinion

Bynum v. United States

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 13, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 11927, Division BPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK B. ELLIS, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant, the United States of America, to compel further answers to interrogatories propounded under Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Only one interrogatory remains in dispute.

Plaintiff instituted this action under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq., alleging that while he was a patient at the Veterans Administration Hospital in New Orleans a cervical laminectomy was performed negligently on him, resulting in serious permanent injui-ies to his legs and other parts of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. B. & S. Drilling Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1959
  3. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diversified Products Corp. v. Sports Center Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Papin Builders, Inc. v. LitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API