Legal Opinion
William Brogan v. San Mateo County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1990No. 88-15809PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
William Brogan appeals pro se the dismissal of his section 1983 complaint challenging the constitutionality of the workfare program in San Mateo County and alleging that participation in the program violated his civil rights. We affirm.
FACTS
On June 10, 1988, Brogan filed a complaint in the district court for the Northern District of California, challenging his mandatory participation in San Mateo County’s Vocational Rehabilitation Program, required as a condition for receiving public assistance. Brogan claimed that the workfare program violated the thirteenth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Heckler v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William Trerice v. Dan A. Pedersen, Captain, U.S. Navy, Commanding Officer, Uss RangerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Sidney Brooks v. Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Arizona Corporation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Zimmerman v. Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Schneider v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.