Legal Opinion
Sidney Brooks v. Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Arizona Corporation Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1991No. 90-16113PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal marks the latest battle in Sidney Brooks’ long-running campaign against a $6.50 monthly service availability charge imposed on him by Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative (“SSVEC”) with the approval of the Arizona Corporation Commission (“the Commission”). Brooks appeals pro se from a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of SSVEC and the Commission.
I
On November 18, 1976, Brooks signed a contract with SSVEC for the extension of electric service to his home. Pursuant to the contract, SSVEC built an extension line to Brooks’ home,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- R. Abcarian v. Meldon LevineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Moore v. County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Turnage v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- US West, Inc. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.