Legal Opinion
Everett v. Schramm
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 24, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-209-WKSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, Chief Judge:
The plaintiffs in this class action, 1 Delaware residents who are or have been recipients of assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program since October 1981, allege that this assistance has been or will be illegally reduced or terminated by the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 602(a)(18) and 602(a)(31). Defendants Schramm and Hayward are state officials who administer the AFDC program in Delaware. Plaintiffs allege that the terminations or reductions of their benefits are not based on Delaware’s “standard of need,” as federal law…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Everett v. SchrammCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Everett v. SchrammCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Society for Good Will to Retarded Children v. CuomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- D.C., Inc. v. State Ex Rel. VincentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- CBS, INC. v. PrimeTime 24 Joint VentureDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998