Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SMITH Et Al. v. DANSON Et Al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1085Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcMlLLIAN, Judge

Although I agree with the result reached by Judge Dillard in his dissenting opinion, I cannot agree with all that is said and thus concur in the judgment only to that opinion.25 See Court of Appeals Rule 33 (a).

The judgment line “concurring in the judgment only of the dissent” first appeared in orneases in 1980 and has been used occasionally since that time. See Ellis v. Dalton, 194 Ga. App. 114 (389 SE2d 797) (1989); Harvey Freeman & Sons, Inc. v. Stanley, 189 Ga. App. 256 (375 SE2d 261) (1988); Travillian v. Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 182 Ga. App. 241 (355 SE2d 677) (1987); Howard v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harvey Freeman & Sons, Inc. v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Howard v. Superior ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Taylor v. GreinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Johnson v. AmersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Menchio v. RymerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API