Legal Opinion

Eurodif S.A. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 3, 2006No. Consol. 02-00219PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

2Per curiam

On May 18, 2006, we remanded the captioned case to the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to exclude low enriched uranium enriched under so-called separative work unit contracts from the scope of the antidumping duty order. See Eurodif S.A. v. United States, 30 CIT -, -, 431 F.Supp.2d 1350 (2006). Commerce has since filed a remand determination; the parties have commented thereon. Upon review of that determination, and the parties’ comments and rebuttals thereto, we find that Commerce has complied with our remand order. We understand the parties’ technical comments on the language of…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Eurodif S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eurodif S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API