Legal Opinion

In re Hudnall

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided November 6, 1995No. V93-64977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell Leach, Judge.

This matter came on to be considered upon applicant’s appeal of the June 20, 1995 order of a three-commissioner panel. The panel’s order approved and affirmed the decision of the single commissioner, who entered judgment for the applicant, Regina Hudnall. However, an award of reparations was not granted, since all of the money received from an insurance settlement must be considered to be a collateral source pursuant to R.C. 2743.60(D).

The applicant contends that the panel should have remanded the matter to the Attorney General to apportion damages received from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re RiosOhio Court of Claims · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ohio Crime Victims Reparations Fund v. Harwell (In Re Harwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. In re CuppOhio Court of Claims · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API