Legal Opinion

Holden v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Tlie appellant and liis son, H. S. Holden,

were, in five separate indictments, jointly indicted for the crime of obtaining money under false pretenses. The charging clause of one of the indictments is as follows : ‘ ‘ The said H. I. Holden and H. S. Holden, in the county and State aforesaid, on the 1st day of August, A. D. 1922, unlawfully, fraudulently and feloniously did! obtain from A. Oliver eighteen dollars and seventy-five cents in gold, silver and paper money of the value of $18.75, the property of A. Oliver, as part payment of an oil, gas and mineral lease on a certain tract of land…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Shinn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Monk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Lockett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Gilchrist v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Easley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API