Legal Opinion

Laurel Land Memorial Park, Inc. v. Pinto

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1962No. 4009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

This action is one in the nature of a suit for a declaratory judgment and also to obtain injunctive relief. The cause was tried without the aid of a jury. The court found that plaintiffs are entitled to a declaratory judgment, and that neither Laurel Land Memorial Park, Inc., nor Widner Organizations, Inc., have any right to sell (directly or indirectly) tombstones, monuments, markers and memorials, and decreed accordingly. The court further found that under defendant’s charters, and under the laws of the State of Texas, that such corporations are not entitled to sell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maud, Tax Collector v. Terrell, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Garcia v. LaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Gilmer, Tex.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1954
  5. Southwestern Gas and Electric Company v. The City of Gilmer, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lea County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. City of PlainsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Coffee v. William Marsh Rice UniversityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Lydia Garza Saenz v. Martin Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. Lydia Garza Saenz v. Martin Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API