Legal Opinion

Illinois Cent. R. v. Ihlenberg

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1896No. 402PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee. This was an action by Rudolph Ihlenberg against the Illinois Central Railroad Company for personal injuries. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee. This was an action by Rudolph Ihlenberg against the Illinois Central Railroad Company for personal injuries. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Rudolph Ihlenberg, the plaintiff below and the defendant in error, was a locomotive fireman employed by the Illinois Central Railroad Company, the defendant below and the plaintiff in error here, in July, 1891. He had been employed as fireman for 18 days before he was hurt, though actually engaged in work but 10 days. He had never…

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, Circuit Judge

The assignments of error seek to raise some questions of evidence, but the record is not in such a condition as to permit it. The court allowed the plaintiff, when on the stand, to answer certain questions put to him by his counsel in respect to the pain he suffered, and the knowledge which he had of locomotives before engaging in the service of the defendant. The questions were objected to; the oh jections were overruled; and no exception was taken to the rulings. The absence of exceptions prevents us from considering the correctness of the court’s action on the objections.

- The main point…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McGrew v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Linde v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Railroad & Telephone Cos. v. Board of Equalizers of TennesseeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1897
  4. Adams v. KuykendallMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Alabama G. S. Ry. Co. v. CogginsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API