Legal Opinion

Pfizer, Inc. v. Lee

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 6, 2014No. Case No. 1:12-cv-01131-GBL-TRJPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Pfizer, Inc. and Wyeth Holdings Corporations’ (collectively, “Pfizer”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) and Defendant Michelle K. Lee on behalf of the USPTO’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32). This case involves the United States Patent and Trademark Offices’ (“USPTO” or “PTO”) decision of abandonment as to Patent Application No. *38710/428,894 (“'894 Application”) and the Patent Terra Adjustment applied to U.S. Patent No. 8,153,768 (the “768 Patent”). Pfizer seeks a determination of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pfizer, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Mishra v. RichardsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
  3. Pfizer, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API