Legal Opinion · Dissent
Burlington Northern R. Co. v. Warren
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 21, 1990No. 89-682Published
1Dissent
The following is part of the trial court's order:
"Were it not for the Duckworth [v. Burlington Northern R.R., 470 So.2d 1094 (Ala. 1985),] decision, this Court would grant the J.N.O.V. This judgment, set aside by the jury, was a pro ami judgment in which a Circuit Judge, in open court, after a hearing, approved the settlement as being in the best interest of the then minor children of plaintiff, Nettie Duckworth. There was no contention, nor any evidence, that any fraud was committed on the Court. Consequently, the recent case of Large v. Hayes, 534 So.2d 1101 (Ala. 1988), would seem to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Large v. Hayes by and Through NesbittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Ex Parte Burlington Northern Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985