Legal Opinion

State v. . Lance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 30, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Cline, J., at January Term, 1914, of TIeNdersoN.

1Opinion of the Court

HOKE and WALKER, J. J., dissenting. Exception 1 cannot be sustained. Statements made to an officer are not incompetent merely because the defendant is at the time in custody or in jail, when they are made without threat or inducement. S. v. Jones,145 N.C. 466; S. v. Bohanon, 142 N.C. 695; S. v. Horner, 139 N.C. 603; S.v. Exum, 138 N.C. 600.

Exception 2. It was not error for the court to refuse to recite a long statement of contentions prepared by prisoner's counsel, when the court stated fully the contentions which were supported by the testimony. If the court had failed to state any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Bohanon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. State v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. State v. Horner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . StorkeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
  5. State v. MondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API