Safford v. Turner
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. These cases are sufficiently stated in the original opinion, filed at the session of the court in July, 1894, and in the opinion herein, filed October 6, 1894.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Gwriam:
These causes were assigned for hearing at the May session, and were then continued until June. Briefs were filed by the plaintiffs in error on the merits. The defendant in error appeared and presented motions to dismiss, *730which were sustained. The plaintiffs in error now move that the cases be reinstated and considered on their merits.
As no brief was filed by the defendant in error, and no sufficient notice of the motion to dismiss was given, we shall treat the cases as though the motions to dismiss were now presented for the first time. Affidavits are now presented by the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Horton v. HainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Bank of Claflin v. RowlinsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
- Phillips v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896