Penner Installation Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
The Government filed a motion for a new trial in this case, which we overruled. It then filed a motion for leave to file a second motion for a new trial, asserting that the issues in this case and in the case of Moorman v. United States, 113 Ct.Cl. 159, 82 F.Supp. 1010, then pending in the Supreme Court on certiorari to this court, were the same, and requesting that if its motion 'for leave to file a second motion was granted, that it be held in abeyance until the Supreme Court’s decision in the Moorman case.
We granted the defendant’s motion, and the Supreme Court has now…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Jonal Corporation v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Meva Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Wagner Whirler & Derrick Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.