Legal Opinion

n The Matter of Baldwin Gardens, Inc. v. McGoldrick

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

This proceeding is brought under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to restrain the New York State Bent Administrator from enforcing the maximum rent established by him pursuant to chapter 250 of the Laws of 1950, entitled “ Emergency Housing Bent Control Law ”, on the ground-that such law is unconstitutional insofar as it affects the petitioner. The respondent has cross-moved to dismiss the petition both on jurisdictional and substantive grounds.

The petitioner is the owner of a 159-family apartment house built in 1940.

Petitioner makes four claims: First: That the maximum rent has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Teeval Co. v. SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. City of New York v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. City of New York v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Matter of Beekman v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pitts v. McGoldrickNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API