Legal Opinion

Haggart v. Stehlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1893No. 16,142PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Prom the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

Suit by appellants against appellees, for damages on account of an alleged nuisance, and for a perpetual injunction against the same.

A separate demurrer by appellee Heidt was sustained, and a separate demurrer by appellee Stehlin, for want of facts, was overruled to the complaint. A demurrer to his answer was overruled, and appellants refusing to plead further, appellees had judgment on the demurrers.

The only errors assigned and noticed in appellants’ brief are the sustaining of appellee Heidt’s demurrer to the complaint and the overruling of appellants’ demurrer to the answer of appellee…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Baumgartner v. HastyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Welsh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Owen v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Reid v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Town of Rome City v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Hoyt v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API