Legal Opinion
Niemic v. UMass Correrctional Health
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 2, 2015No. Civil Action No. 13-11402-WGYPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
Keith Niemic (“Niemic”) brings this suit pro se against UMass Correctional Health (“UMCH”), Thomas Hicks (“Hicks”), Geraldine Somers (“Somers”), Aysha Hameed (“Hameed”), Bart Nelson (“Nelson”), Mark Schnabel (“Schnabel”), Carmen Newry (“Newry”), and Thomas Groblewski (“Groblewski”)1 (collectively, the “Medical Defendants”) seeking injunctive relief and damages for alleged violations of the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, and Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 12,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lopes v. RiendeauDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Roman-Montañez v. Torres-MendezUnited States District Court · 2018
- Hickey v. ThompkinsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Nassar v. RuzeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Snell v. DescoteauxDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.