Legal Opinion

Morris & Essex Railroad v. Hoboken & Manhattan Railroad

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 19, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, V. C. (orally.).

In the case of the Morris and Essex Railroad Company and the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company against the Hoboken and Manhattan Railroad Company and the .New York and Jersey Railroad Company my conclusion is that no proper case is presented for an injunction. I shall endeavor, as fully as I can, to indicate to counsel the main reasons which have led me to this conclusion, reserving for a written opinion, in case of appeal, a more accurate statement, with citation of authorities. I have examined, I think, all the authorities cited by counsel and some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Beasley v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abeles v. GuelickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. J. Jacob Shannon & Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  3. Patrisco v. Nolan's Point Amusement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  4. Dawson v. PineCamden County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API