Morris & Essex Railroad v. Hoboken & Manhattan Railroad
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevenson, V. C. (orally.).
In the case of the Morris and Essex Railroad Company and the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company against the Hoboken and Manhattan Railroad Company and the .New York and Jersey Railroad Company my conclusion is that no proper case is presented for an injunction. I shall endeavor, as fully as I can, to indicate to counsel the main reasons which have led me to this conclusion, reserving for a written opinion, in case of appeal, a more accurate statement, with citation of authorities. I have examined, I think, all the authorities cited by counsel and some…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Beasley v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Abeles v. GuelickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- J. Jacob Shannon & Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Patrisco v. Nolan's Point Amusement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Dawson v. PineCamden County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1928