Legal Opinion

Jewell v. State of Ga.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1991No. A91A0262PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The state filed this action pursuant to OCGA § 16-13-49 (e), seeking to condemn $4,310 in United States currency which had been seized from the appellant’s person, as well as an A-K 47 automatic rifle and a Browning 9mm pistol which had been seized from his residence. Following a non-jury trial, the court below concluded that the $4,310 was subject to forfeiture because it was intended to be used to purchase a controlled substance and that the weapons were subject to forfeiture because they “had been used and were intended for use to facilitate the unlawful manufacture,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohran v. CarlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Bicknell v. JOYCE SPORTSWEAR COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Georgia Building Services, Inc. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Hampshire Homes, Inc. v. Espinosa Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Hathaway Development Co. v. Advantage Fire Sprinkler Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API