Jewell v. State of Ga.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Banke, Presiding Judge.
The state filed this action pursuant to OCGA § 16-13-49 (e), seeking to condemn $4,310 in United States currency which had been seized from the appellant’s person, as well as an A-K 47 automatic rifle and a Browning 9mm pistol which had been seized from his residence. Following a non-jury trial, the court below concluded that the $4,310 was subject to forfeiture because it was intended to be used to purchase a controlled substance and that the weapons were subject to forfeiture because they “had been used and were intended for use to facilitate the unlawful manufacture,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohran v. CarlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Bicknell v. JOYCE SPORTSWEAR COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Georgia Building Services, Inc. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Hampshire Homes, Inc. v. Espinosa Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Hathaway Development Co. v. Advantage Fire Sprinkler Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.