Drake v. Jordan
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Wapello Circuit Court. Plaintiff asks' the abatement of a nuisance, and the restraining of defendants from maintaining tbe same, and from keeping for sale and from selling intoxicating liquors contrary to law. Decree for plaintiff as prayed. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
1. INTOXICATING liquors: nuisance: constitutionality of statute : federal question. I. After filing their answer, the defendants presented their petition to the circuit court asking a removal of the case to the federal court. The petition was denied, and objection to that ruling is now made. The grounds of the petitions for removal were substantially the same as those in Dickinson v. Heeb Brewing Co., ante, 705. Following our decision in that case, the action of the circuit court in denying the removal is affirmed.
*708changed after action begun, *707II. The circuit court decreed the closing of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marion v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- McLane v. BonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Ehleringer v. MoriartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rish v. Iowa Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Gano v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Mcclure v. BraniffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Burk v. PutmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- State v. TaggartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.