Legal Opinion

James Elmore Puckett v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1963No. 298PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is taken from an order entered, without a hearing, denying appellant relief under a motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant, James Elmore Puckett, together with a co-defendant, appeared in the court below without counsel on June 29, 1961, for arraignment upon an information charging the two defendants with violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. The attorney for the government stated to the court that both defendants were charged with the same offense and he understood that appellant desired to waive his constitutional right to the assistance…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Emil Richard Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. The United States of America v. Aubrey Westley MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Leonard Goforth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  4. John Joseph Putnam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. William Frederick Semet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API