Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Pugh

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1993No. 9221SC442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

The imposition of Rule 11 sanctions against Attorney B. Ervin Brown, II arose out of a civil action by Paula Lowery Pugh against her estranged common-law husband, Larry Scott Pugh, members of his family, and his business associates.

Following the estrangement of Paula and Larry Scott Pugh, various defendants took out criminal warrants against Paula for several misdemeanor offenses, including communicating threats and trespass (“the first set of warrants”). Paula subsequently retained the legal services of High Point attorney Debra Irene Johnson, to whom she told of her experiences…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Kunstler.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Bryson v. SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Needle v. White, Mindel, Clarke and HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Turner v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Static Control Components, Inc. v. VoglerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Pugh v. PughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Bald Head Island, Ltd. v. Village of Bald Head IslandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API