Legal Opinion

Riad Elsolh Mohamad Hamad v. Friedman, Weddington, Hansen & Fisher And Gary F. DeShazo & Associates

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided February 16, 1994No. 03-93-00620-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

AT AUSTIN

NO. 3-93-620-CV

RIAD ELSOLH MOHAMAD HAMAD,

APPELLANT

vs.

FRIEDMAN, WEDDINGTON, HANSEN & FISHER; AND

GARY F. DESHAZO & ASSOCIATES,

APPELLEES

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 93-03000, HONORABLE PAUL R. DAVIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

2Per curiam

Appellant Riad Elsolh Mohamad Hamad seeks to appeal from a judgment of the district court of Travis County dismissing his action against appellees Friedman, Weddington, Hansen & Fisher and Gary F. DeShazo & Associates. (1) Because the Court concludes that it does not have jurisdiction…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davies v. MasseyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. White v. Baker & Botts, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Ramirez v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Modern Living, Inc. v. AlworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Lopez v. Foremost Paving, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API